Not Harmed

Marcus Aurelius knew that irrespective of the severity of incidents, there’s always a choice in how we judge them. “Choose to not be harmed—and you will not feel harmed.

In general, the quantity of suffering that humans endure depends, for the foremost part, on the whims of fate. But it varies per person to what degree fate affects them. Some features may be harmful to 1 person but don’t affect another. Also, many folks tend to experience certain past events as hurtful for several years, while others shake off their negative experiences and don’t let the past ruin the current and future. And a minimum of as typical are people who feel continually harmed by things that haven’t even happened yet, which can sound ridiculous, but it’s precisely what chronic worries do. It’s not the skin world and also the events that occur in it—our organizations included—that hurt us, but our thoughts, memories, and fantasies regarding them.

Thus, the key to resilience lies within the inner faculty, which is that the only place of the human existence that we’ve got complete control over. The philosophy of Stoicism concerns itself with strengthening the mind instead of strengthening anything outside of it, which is secondary and will have as little influence on our well-being as humanly possible.

Marcus Aurelius called the mind the ruler of the soul.

This assertion seems to be in line with Buddhist understanding because the historical Buddha stated that “nothing precedes the mind.”

So, conclusively, how we expect decides how we feel.

For example, if we experience physical pain, we will make it worse by fighting and resisting it.

We can also generate fear on top of the pain, dwelling on the thought that our pain will never end or perhaps worsens within the future.

Eventually, our thinking may cause more suffering than the physical pain itself.

Marcus Aurelius argued that our minds should be “unstirred by agitations of the flesh – gentle and violent ones alike.”

What he precisely meant by agitations of the flesh remains unclear.

But it seems that this crossing is about physical pain and also the role of the mind in experiencing it.

The idea of injuries to the body, as an example, is terrifying for many people, and that we generally visit great lengths to avoid such physical pain.

Unfortunately, life gives us no guarantees that we are operating to never incur it. It’s plausible that we experience painful illnesses, accidents and become victims of violence at some point in our lives.

For the foremost significant part, this is often not in our control.

But in keeping with Antoninus, “nothing happens to anyone that he can’t endure.”

Even though pain is an inevitable part of human life, we’ve got a choice whether or not we experience additional pain on top of what the surface world imposes on us. We cannot expect what can’t be delivered. Confidence and hope aren’t bad things in themselves.

But if they’re not in line with reality, then the error is that the logical consequence.

Expecting luck alone is asking the impossible. Wishing never to become sick, never be insulted, never be ridiculed is asking the impossible. we have the maximum amount of control over this stuff as a rock controls the waves crashing on that.

For the mind that expects an excessive amount of, life is continually guilty, as reality never satisfies. Marcus Aurelius Antoninus repeatedly points to providence. From a Stoic point of view, providence means nothing happens what nature has not intended. So, everything we perceive as defects is intentional and, therefore, exactly how it should be.

Dishonest, arrogant, grasping, jealous, and bold people are a part of this world, similar to vice, virtue, happiness, sadness, good, and evil. Wishing otherwise would be a wish against nature itself. Don’t ask the impossible. There must be shameless people within the world. this is often one among them. the identical for somebody vicious or untrustworthy, or with the other defect.

As long as there’s life, there’ll be illness and death. As long as there are people, there’ll be those with defects. Not asking the impossible means stop trying to vary the universe.

We can’t eff regardless of what proportion we try. The universe always wins. If we accept this, we’ll see the worth in lowering our expectations. And if we stop wanting something to happen as we wish but wish for them to happen as they are doing happen, is there anything left that will harm us.

There’s beauty in decay and imperfection. We only should study the cracks in an old wall or the crookedness of trees, and we’ll notice that this stuff is engaging.

Marcus Aurelius wrote about loaves of bread split open on top within the oven and the way the ridges, a by-product of baking, are pleasing and rouse the appetite. He knew that nature’s recklessness has its own charm.

An aging face, a wrinkled apple, the ruins of a city we frequently consider beautiful, although they need been subject to decay. I quote: and then if a person contains a feeling for, and a deeper insight into the processes of the Universe, there’s hardly one but will somehow appear to occur pleasantly to him, even among mere attendant circumstances. Such a person also will feel no less pleasure in viewing the particular jaws of untamed beasts than at the imitations which painters and sculptors exhibit, and he are going to be enabled to determine in an old woman or an old gentleman a sort of freshness and bloom. So, why don’t we treat life’s adversities the same way?

Life, overall, incorporates a rough side thereto.

Many things appear that don’t resemble our expectations. For example, the romance between two people may arouse fantasies of a beautiful future concomitantly but may end up in a vale of tears instead. Or a promising career, withdrawn up by significant experience in the field and various degrees may come to an end because of illness. And even when our lives are without catastrophe, and everything plays out as we had hoped for, we’ll eventually end up sick and dead.

So, we could spend our lives sustaining the ugly and be miserable when we experience it, but it’s still part of the game. Oftentimes, it’s adversity (not prosperity) that rouses creative people like writers, filmmakers, artists, musicians, and poets, to bring about formulations that attract attention.

Instead of detesting adversity, we could develop an attraction for it, like we accept the ridges as part of the bread, as much as the bread itself. The ugly always accompanies the beautiful. And if we only want the latter and detest the former, we deny Nature as a whole. But if we learn to welcome misfortune as much as a stroke of luck, we’re less flourished when life gives us lemons. Moreover, we can almost always find some good in the worst of circumstances. Misfortune can inspire us, remind us of our fragility, change our perspective on life, and lead us to become more compassionate to others.

If we see beauty in whatever submerges us, fate will rarely ever harm us. When our judgments work against us, we suffer. As outside circumstances are beyond our control, we add value to things that we don’t have potential over by judging them. As a consequence, something that’s not up to us can determine how we feel.

Leave a Reply